Field of Science
-
-
Nobel laureate joins the autism cranks at AutismOne conference12 hours ago in Genomics, Evolution, and Pseudoscience
-
-
-
Music to my ears!1 day ago in The Phytophactor
-
-
-
-
-
-
The protein makes the poison: Dancing fruit flies and terfenadine4 days ago in The Curious Wavefunction
-
-
-
When waiting is not an option1 week ago in The Allotrope
-
-
Skull Mechanics of Capitosaurs (Amphibia: Temnospondyli)2 weeks ago in Chinleana
-
Since one can't be snarky in a response to a review...2 weeks ago in Games with Words
-
-
In which I am elsewhere5 weeks ago in A is for Aspirin
-
-
Chocolate and Microbes this Easter1 month ago in The View from a Microbiologist
-
Finding a new translation factor, and verifying it with help from my experimental friends1 month ago in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
-
-
-
-
Free ImageJ Macro -- for citing images5 months ago in Skeptic Wonder
-
-
-
The Large Picture Blog Has Moved8 months ago in The Large Picture Blog
-
Lab Rat Moving House8 months ago in Life of a Lab Rat
-
Goodbye FoS, thanks for all the laughs10 months ago in Disease Prone
-
Branson getting into microbial diversity in the deep sea1 year ago in The Greenhouse
-
Flying is Unsustainable
Today I am crossing Australia, the Pacific, and then the West Coast by airplane and I feel guilty. You see everything that I do in my daily life to be environmentally friendly is nullified by my airplane travel. Even if I was completely carbon neutral in my daily life the excessive amount of airplane travel that I partake in each year would place me me in the same ranks as the worst polluters in America. According to a green manifesto (also see this description of 'low-energy astrophysics') by astrophysicist P.J. Marshall and others the average energy consumption per day of a person in the U.S. is 250 kWh/day/person. An astrophysicist uses an extra 133kWh/day/astronomer, yet the vast majority of that additional energy usage, 113 kWh/day/astronomer, is contributed by flying. The key message of the manifesto is that while astronomers are not actually a significant energy consumer in the U.S. (they use 0.001% of the national total energy production) we are high profile scientists who must set an example. Astronomers believe global warming is real, and thus must act.
2 Comments:
Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Apparently, according to my daughter (14 going on 30), I owe you an apology for the following:
ReplyDeleteMisleading you into believing in drop bears.
Pretending to be a nice guy.
"The whole astrologer / astronomer thing"
Trolling the comment section of your blog.
Being "shifty" (whatever that means.)
So......
suck it up cupcake 'cos it ain't happening.
Have a good flight mate. Catchya next time.
With the advent of the internet and technologies like Skype, a large percentage of business meetings and many conferences of all kinds could be conducted via the web.
ReplyDeleteWe have developed a bad habit of excessive air travel, and other forms of travel, because we have gone through a period of plentiful energy and environmental neglect.
Time to exchange those bad habits for more sustainable ones.
A good place to start would be with more sensible reproductive choices. If the human species cannot control its alarming population growth, then not much else matters.
RLO