in Pleiotropy
Field of Science
-
-
in The View from a Microbiologist
-
in PLEKTIX
-
in Disease Prone
-
in inkfish
-
in Doc Madhattan
-
in Moss Plants and More
-
in Life of a Lab Rat
-
in The Greenhouse
-
in Angry by Choice
-
in Chinleana
-
in History of Geology
-
in Sex, Genes & Evolution
-
in The Curious Wavefunction
-
in Labs
-
in The Large Picture Blog
-
in C6-H12-O6
-
in Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
-
in Catalogue of Organisms
-
in Skeptic Wonder
-
in The Biology Files
-
in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
-
in The Phytophactor
-
in The Astronomist
-
in A is for Aspirin
-
in The Allotrope
-
in Variety of Life
-
in Memoirs of a Defective Brain
-
in Rule of 6ix
-
in Epiphenom
-
in RRResearch
-
in The Culture of Chemistry
-
in Field Notes
-
in Games with Words
Flying is Unsustainable
Today I am crossing Australia, the Pacific, and then the West Coast by airplane and I feel guilty. You see everything that I do in my daily life to be environmentally friendly is nullified by my airplane travel. Even if I was completely carbon neutral in my daily life the excessive amount of airplane travel that I partake in each year would place me me in the same ranks as the worst polluters in America. According to a green manifesto (also see this description of 'low-energy astrophysics') by astrophysicist P.J. Marshall and others the average energy consumption per day of a person in the U.S. is 250 kWh/day/person. An astrophysicist uses an extra 133kWh/day/astronomer, yet the vast majority of that additional energy usage, 113 kWh/day/astronomer, is contributed by flying. The key message of the manifesto is that while astronomers are not actually a significant energy consumer in the U.S. (they use 0.001% of the national total energy production) we are high profile scientists who must set an example. Astronomers believe global warming is real, and thus must act.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
