Field of Science

  • in Pleiotropy
  • in The View from a Microbiologist
  • in PLEKTIX
  • in Disease Prone
  • in inkfish
  • in Doc Madhattan
  • in Moss Plants and More
  • in Life of a Lab Rat
  • in The Greenhouse
  • in Angry by Choice
  • in Chinleana
  • in History of Geology
  • in Sex, Genes & Evolution
  • in The Curious Wavefunction
  • in Labs
  • in The Large Picture Blog
  • in C6-H12-O6
  • in Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
  • in Catalogue of Organisms
  • in Skeptic Wonder
  • in The Biology Files
  • in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
  • in The Phytophactor
  • in The Astronomist
  • in A is for Aspirin
  • in The Allotrope
  • in Variety of Life
  • in Memoirs of a Defective Brain
  • in Rule of 6ix
  • in Epiphenom
  • in RRResearch
  • in The Culture of Chemistry
  • in Field Notes
  • in Games with Words

Flying is Unsustainable

Today I am crossing Australia, the Pacific, and then the West Coast by airplane and I feel guilty. You see everything that I do in my daily life to be environmentally friendly is nullified by my airplane travel. Even if I was completely carbon neutral in my daily life the excessive amount of airplane travel that I partake in each year would place me me in the same ranks as the worst polluters in America. According to a green manifesto (also see this description of 'low-energy astrophysics') by astrophysicist P.J. Marshall and others the average energy consumption per day of a person in the U.S. is 250 kWh/day/person. An astrophysicist uses an extra 133kWh/day/astronomer, yet the vast majority of that additional energy usage, 113 kWh/day/astronomer, is contributed by flying. The key message of the manifesto is that while astronomers are not actually a significant energy consumer in the U.S. (they use 0.001% of the national total energy production) we are high profile scientists who must set an example. Astronomers believe global warming is real, and thus must act.